A few screenshots from 2020, taken over the course of two hour Friday night in a disjointed sequence of nearly 40 tweets, shows the San Francisco company debating a choice. Controversial sharing restrictionNew York Post story about sonJoe Biden was the then-Democratic presidential nominee.
Based on Substack writer Matt Taibbi’s internal communications, a Twitter thread showed that the company decided to limit the article’s spread independently without Democratic politicians, Biden campaign or FBI control. The only input from a sat politician that Thebes saw was from Silicon Valley Rep. Ro Khanna, who told Twitter executives that they had to circulate the story regardless of any potential consequences for his party.
Jamil Jafar, director at Columbia University’s Knight First Amendment Institute, stated in an interview that “I’m not convinced” this is a bomb.
Musk made the extraordinary decision to make public the leakage of company communications to Thebes. Expose namesKhanna’s personal email address for many regular workers.
The online mob attacked Twitter employees of the chain, posting their photos online and threatening them.
“Publicly publishing the names and identities of frontline employees involved in content moderation puts them in harm’s way and is fundamentally unacceptable,” said Twitter’s former head of trust and safety Yoel Roth, who was among the employees named in the tweets. In a social media post.
Tibi, Musk and Twitter didn’t immediately respond to our requests for comment.
Musk admitted some of his mistakes in an audio chat on Twitter Spaces Saturday afternoon. He also mentioned “some instances where we should have excluded certain email addresses”.
Musk stated that the idea was to “reveal everything that has happened in the past to build public trust for the future” during Twitter Spaces that were plagued with technical difficulties. Musk stated that he joined via Starlink satellite link from his private plane.
Musk also voiced disapproval at the media’s coverage.
He stated that instead of admitting to lying to the public, they are trying to pretend that this isn’t actually a burger. “Shame on them.”
Musk and Tibi both said that they would share more information about a second season Saturday. Musk also stated on Spaces that he had shared the documents with another Substack writer Bari Weiss and suggested that he might make them available to the public in future.
This scene was the culmination of another chaotic week for Musk’s Twitter. He had just completed a “Chief Twit”, Friday afternoon. Meeting with French President Emmanuel MacronIt is a deterrent to reports The emergence of hate speechOn Twitter. It attracts attention. For rapper Yee’s comment which was tweet swastika imageWith the Star of David. The Star of David. Re-launch of the paid check mark system According to a source familiar with the matter, the Friday one was delayed again. The person spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss this decision.
Musk stated, “I personally wanted Kanye to punch me,” explaining that Ye’s swastika was a form of violence incitement. He said that he had made the decision to suspend Ye.
Musk’s agenda defined “freedom to express” His tumultuous takeover of TwitterHe argued From the early days of the dealThe platform would be an “actual city square” in which people could “speak freely within legal boundaries”. He stated that the company had a “strong leftwing bias”. In recent days, he has issued an amnesty For a number of previously suspended accountsThis includes far-right influencers as well as people associated with QAnon extremist thoughts.
Musk stated that he supports some policies of the Democratic Party, but not all. Increasingly it seems that he is flirtingThe Republican Party. In the weeks leading up to the midterm elections he encouraged millions to vote Republican. He recently stated that he would support Ron DeSantis (R), Florida Governor in a potential 2024 presidential campaign.
Musk’s promotion for internal snapshots that include employee names is a remarkable move, given that he has repeatedly promised transparency on the platform. Tibi stated that he had to agree to certain terms in order to cover the files in Substack subscribers. He asked them for patience and acknowledged that some customers might be upset that the information was posted on the social network first.
Musk retweeted Taibbi’s thread on Friday night. It focused on Twitter’s decision to block the article about the leaked content from a laptop belonging to Hunter Biden from being shared. According to the New York Post story, emails show that Musk gave an executive from Ukraine an “opportunity” for him to meet with the former vice President.
Hunter Biden, attorney for the Biden campaign at that time, denied that such an event had occurred. The White House also cited these earlier denials. The Washington Post checked in detail. The authenticity of thousands more emails from the device was confirmed by the Post, citing experts, and they were used as a file basis for explorationHunter Biden also pursued trade agreements in China.
At a congressional hearing in November 2020Jack Dorsey was Twitter’s CEO at the time. He said that Twitter erred by limiting the article’s spread under its policy against publication hacked materials, a 2018 rule meant to discourage unauthorized exposure private information. Dorsey stated that the company reviewed the comments and modified its policy on hack materials.
“We gave a quick explanation that the article was obtained via hacking, and we, in accordance to our policy, stopped its spread,” he stated. “After further reflection, we admitted that the procedure was incorrect and corrected it within 24hrs.”
Facebook took similar steps and actively limited the spread of stories while they were being submitted to third party fact-checkers.
Twitter’s actions to limit the sharing of a New York Post article were unusual. They posted warnings that it might not be safe and locked accounts that shared it, including those of Kayleigh McEnany, White House spokeswoman. Conservatives were critical of the move, using it as ammunition to claim that tech companies are censoring their views.
Taibbi’s screenshots indicate that Twitter received an angry email. It stated that a Donald Trump campaign staffer sent it, and that the company needed to give information about McEnany.
A staff member explained to Trump campaign that the account “bounced”, because it violated the hacked materials policy. Mike Hahn was a former Trump employee who signed and released the email. Musk was praised for his transparency.
He stated, “It certainly feels great being acquitted in relation to Twitter’s war against freedom of expression.”
Taibbi also shared screenshots that showed communications staff asking Twitter executives to provide guidance on how to explain their decision. Staff member expressed concern that the procedure could become the focal point of the Capitol Hill hearing, where Dorsey was due to appear.
Khanna, a Silicon Valley Democrat contacted Vijaya Jade, the former CEO, on Twitter to offer to talk about the “backlash to The Hill’s letter.” Jade replied by saying that the company had posted a thread on Twitter explaining their decision.
Khanna replied, stating that the move seemed to violate First Amendment principles. He said, “But in light of the presidential campaign it seems that restricting publication of newspaper articles (even though the New York Post may be far-right) will cause greater backlash than good.”
Khanna’s Office confirmed the authenticity of these emails. Khanna, in response to Khanna’s personal email, reiterated his support of the First Amendment.
He said that he was annoyed by the situation, but that he had taken all necessary security precautions.
According to Tibi, both political parties had access tools to report content to Twitter for review. The company has also “received requests, honors, and honors” from the White House as well as the Biden campaign.
Musk responded to a tweet that used a fire emoticon. He highlighted an exchange in which a Twitter employee claimed they “handled” a review on tweets from Team Biden. The tweets contained apparently nude photos of Hunter Biden, according to Internet Archive records.
Friday night’s event — which began about an hour late after Musk said they were doing more fact-checking — had a mixed response.
Tucker Carlson, Fox News host, described it as “one of the most remarkable moments in social media historical,” while the New York Post headlined it as “Hunter Biden’s Laptop Bomb”. #TWITTERGATE was the US’s most popular hashtag on Saturday.
However, the thread left some Twitter critics wanting more.
“Look, I think we saw a lot of useful. It’s not really the smoke gun we were hoping for,” said New York Post columnist Miranda Devine on Carlson’s show. She claimed without evidence that Musk “blocked some material.”
Sebastian Gorka, a former deputy adviser to Trump, tweeted “So far I am so frustrated”.
The whole episode increased tension between Musk and his employees at the company he was leading.
One of the recently fired employees stated, “We are pissed.” “It is absolutely distasteful for them to release names to the public. It could kill someone.”
Matt Feather contributed to the report.
Source link
[Denial of responsibility! reporterbyte.com is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – reporterbyte.com The content will be deleted within 24 hours.]
